Transcript of Erich fromm:imati ili biti(). Results Erich fromm:imati ili biti( 58) Drive MODUS IMANJA MODUS BIVSTVOVANJA Core UČENJE SIJEČANJE. “How to Be a Good Creature: A Memoir in Thirteen Animals” by Sy Montgomery “ This is a beautiful book — essential reading for anyone who loves animals and. HomeEric From – Imati ili Biti. Eric From – Imati ili Biti. August 3, mzsula · Erich Fromm-imati ili biti. Advertisements. Share this: Twitter · Facebook · Google .
|Published (Last):||24 November 2004|
|PDF File Size:||20.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.79 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Erich fromm:imati ili biti() by Megy Matijevic on Prezi
The people having unlimited needs and desires like the Roman emperorsthe English and French noblemen were the people who got the most out of it. To Have or to Be? In the industrial age, the development of this economic il was no longer determined by the question of what is good for man, but rather of what is good for the growth of the system.
He mentions the great promise of unlimited happiness, freedommaterial abundance, and domination of nature. So, the economic system of society served people in such a way in which only their personal interests were intended to impart.
One could feel that there would be unlimited production and hence unlimited consumption.
Wikipedia articles with style issues from March All articles with style issues Pages to import images to Wikidata. In every mode of life, people should ponder more iamti “being” nature and not towards the “having” nature.
This is the truth which people deny and thus people of the modern world have completely lost their inner selves.
Erich Fromm: Imati ili biti by Anamaria Malesevic on Prezi
Fromm writes that modern society has become materialistic and prefers “having” to “being”. This page was last edited on 6 Novemberat Society nowadays has completely deviated from its actual path. Modern industrialization iati made great promises, but all these promises are developed to fulfill their interests and increase their possessions.
This article reads like a review rather than an encyclopedic description of the subject. Frimm help improve this article to make it neutral in tone and meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. The point of being is more important as everyone is mortal, and thus having of possessions will become useless after their deathbecause the possessions which are transferred to ii life after deathwill be what the person actually was inside.
The great promise failed due to the unachievable aims of life, i. Retrieved from ” https: The materialistic nature of people of “having” has been more developed than “being”. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Views Read Edit View history.