Julien Benda’s classic study of s Europe resonates today. The “treason of the intellectuals” is a phrase that evokes much but is inherently ambiguous. In , the French essayist Julien Benda published his famous attack on the intellectual corruption of the age, La Trahison des clercs. I said “famous,” but. key words: Julien Benda, European integration, intellectuals, nation-building, French thinker’s book The Betrayal of the Intellectuals is almost inevitably.
|Published (Last):||6 March 2008|
|PDF File Size:||15.33 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.90 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This polemical essay argued that European intellectuals in the 19th and 20th century had often lost the ability to reason dispassionately about political and military matters, instead becoming apologists for crass nationalism, warmongering and od. Retrieved from ” https: Lists with This Book. Benda defended the measured and dispassionate outlook of classical civilizationand the betrayl of traditional Christianity.
Jan rated it it was amazing Mar 16, I read Indonesian version, -Pengkhiantan Kaum Cendikiawan.
Foucauldian Critique and the Political Role of Intellectuals. The attack on the universal went forward in social and political life as well as in the refined precincts of epistemology and metaphysics: The predictions in the work became reality in the most devestating ways holocaustbut perhaps the scary part is that is still so relevant to contemporary issues faced today.
Be the first to ask a question about The Treason of the Intellectuals. Request removal from index. Only an ignoramus who believed that there were important distinctions, qualitative distinctions, between the barbarian and the civilized man itnellectuals possibly think of objecting.
In other words, the real treason of the intellectuals was not that they countenanced Callicles but that they championed him. The real damage done by a man like Trump is that he incites all around him to forget entirely that there are such things as ideals. Sep 27, Wahyu Krisyanto rated it really liked it Shelves: The Treason of the Intellectuals.
Julien Benda – Wikiquote
This is not to say that what is has said is not relevant or important. In closing, bitterly, he concludes: From the time of the pre-Socratics, Julien Benda – – W. intellectuuals
Could there possibly be anywhere deeper to go? To a large extent, the abdication of reason demanded by multiculturalism has been the result of what we might call bbenda subjection of culture to anthropology.
The Treason of the Intellectuals – Julien Benda – Google Books
This made sense to me at the time. Jul 03, BlackOxford rated it really liked it Shelves: I feel this book leaves its arguments vaguely unfinished, and instead rests oof case on historical failures and predictions, such as grand wars, which could intllectuals been explained away by other means, and often were.
Academics and journalists, pundits, moralists, and pontificators of all varieties are in this sense clercs. Si-Liang Luo – – Modern Philosophy 4: Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. The author sometimes repeats himself, but this is still a very good and important book.
And this brings us to the question of freedom.
Winning is the only measure of success no matter how banal, or destructive, or painful to others the competition might be. Julien Benda — was a benea and critic. It was translated into English in by Richard Aldington ; the U. The pedlars have a constituency, from this they enjoy celebrity, and from celebrity they derive wealth with which to peddle more intellectual junk.
Julien Benda 26 December — 7 June was a French philosopher and novelist. Inintellectuals still had something definite to betray.
The geography of intellectual betrayal has changed dramatically in the last sixty-odd years. One can only observe that, if anything, the situation has become worse since Hesse and Benda wrote. Today we are trying to spread knowledge everywhere. Sign in to use this feature. In this sense, the book is a trahison des clercs for the post-Communist world, a world dominated as much by the leveling imperatives of pop culture as by resurgent nationalism and ethnic separatism.
Who is going to think outside the box, and want something moral and Even though the first edition of this book was inwhich can seem ancient, but the main issues that it adresses are still alive today, and are still a problem. It oddly enough, seems to offer the beginnings of an explanation for why the alt-right and antifa might be considered equally nationalistic, fascistic, and ethically relativistic in the modern political world.
Even though the first edition of this book was inwhich can seem ancient, but the main issues that it adresses are still alive today, and are still a problem. Who – if not intellectuals? Vladislav Yastremsky rated it liked it Feb 10, julienn The diatribe that Horkheimer and Adorno mounted against the concept of Enlightenment reminds us of an important peculiarity about the history of Enlightenment: