Italienischer Humanismus und Marxismus. Zum Problem Theorie und Praxis ( Fortsetzung und Schluß).Ernesto Grassi – – Zeitschrift für Philosophische. Karl Korsch, Marxismus und Philosophie (Leipzig, C. L. Hirschfield, ). © Telos Press Publishing. «Previous | Next Article» Table of Contents. Buy Marxismus und Philosophie by Karl Korsch (ISBN:) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders.

Author: Shara Mezilabar
Country: Angola
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 22 January 2008
Pages: 251
PDF File Size: 2.53 Mb
ePub File Size: 12.12 Mb
ISBN: 475-2-54359-158-1
Downloads: 67069
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Barg

Marxismus Und Philosophie

That every practical step brings something new to theory, this is not subject to doubt, because knowledge is always given only in practice; but that every new step forces a review of theory — that is not true. After all, in relation to opportunists, not only do they stand being accused by Lenin of forgetting the problem of the state, but also of questions of revolution in general. But the further inability for the bourgeois to play a revolutionary role did not at all mean that in this historical situation there are no more actors in that role, but that every actor still entering the stage of his future is the first act following the first performance of the previous actor.

And besides it being indeed difficult to indicate as of yet the sort of conception, which carries such provisional character and is to such an extent defined in reliance on the person employing it, what does one understand by philosophy? Similarly, Marx and Engels do not force us to consider the denial by philosophy of scientific socialism to be fictitious.

Finally, I allow myself to stop before one more specific standpoint of comrade Korsch. First of all, one cannot avoid to bring attention to the fact that comrade Korsch admits a certain — if such an expression be permitted — liberty in handling the term philosophy: These were not only not idealism, but were also innocent of the field of dialectics.

The revolution is the first such border, and as such the first part of Marxist epoch. Nevertheless, the interest of the question raised by it does not allow one to pass over some of the positions, advanced by the author, deserving praise in every way for the thoroughness with which the themes are treated, and to a certain extent justifies the resolve in — perhaps somewhat prematurely — speaking out about them. Bourgeois revolutionary turned into bourgeois counter-revolutionary, and stepped aside for the revolutionary proletarian.


Marxismus und Philosophie

Wien, Europa Verlag Services Email this article to a colleague Alert me when this philoeophie is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Download to citation manager.

And in this there is not any sort of need for guardianship of revolutionary pureness of Marxism: Historisch-logischen Untersuchungen zur Frage der materialistischen Dialektik.

Counter-revolutionary practice could hardly correspond with a philosophical algebra of revolution: What content it is invested with in this conception is impossible to say, precisely.

If the first two could still be overcome by bourgeois thought by Dilthey and his schoolthen the last represents its limit, which already phiolsophie be crossed: The reason for it is the idiosyncratic conception of philosophy in lhilosophie we remark, additionally, that here the conception of dialectics cannot be without fault: In reality, this is exactly what happened: That, if I succeeded in reporting correctly, is the content of the article of comrade Korsch.

But, after all, one cannot ignore that this is only a figurative expression, and in its precise parts it can escape even the author himself, which, in my opinion, happens in this case. From this point of view, furthermore, the fact that opportunism usually begins with a critique of the philosophical part of the Marxist worldview becomes clear: Understanding philosophy as the expression of the revolutionary action, by korsvh to his standpoint, must conclude that the period of social marxismuw, bringing a corresponding modification in the domain of theory, must inevitably cause the rejection of philosophy, the denial for it of a right to count as something real.


After all, arguing that a maexismus could lead an independent existence outside of the actual movement of life meant leaving the materialist-dialectical point of view and stepping into idealism. The first must be denoted as the limitedness of philosophical arrogance, and is expressed in that philosophy overlooks how the ideal content of philosophy can rather easily have its substance also marximus the limits of the latter, in different kinds of science that also have a place in relation precisely to Hegelian philosophy.

And exactly against such conception of philosophy as a sort of super-science presenting a human absolute truth, Marxism directed its blows.

But this solution in no way corresponds to the actual state of affairs. The bourgeoisie fell back, to Kant from Hegel. With such a formulation of the problem, in the opinion of the author, not only does marxiamus raise the problem to its highest meaning, like the problems of state and revolution, but also allows us to understand the neglect of korch by the theoreticians of the Second International: Abstract At present — ed.

It could certainly be said that this misunderstanding of Marxism from the side of bourgeois professors is a product of their class interests, but the author imagines such an interpretation to be slightly simplified; he tries to find another way, by revealing the underlying socio-historical condition that forced the representative bourgeois philosophy to reject the marxsimus method.

Lázlo Rádványi, Karl Korsch, “Marxismus und Philosophie” – PhilPapers

Its development runs side by side with the development of phiposophie very society. Monthly downloads Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Healy – – Workers Revolutionary Party. Nevertheless, he declares, and promises further on to demonstrate, that regardless of all differences, they both coincide in one crucial point: